The court ruled that Abbott’s order “provides Texas voters more ways to vote in the November 3 election than does the Election Code” and that it doesn’t “disenfranchise anyone.”
Opponents of Abbott’s order had argued it exceeded the governor’s authority and also created an unjust burden on voters in larger counties to travel far distances to drop off their ballots. Critics also argued it increased voters’ risk of contracting Covid-19.
The court did not agree with the plaintiffs’ argument that the governor’s order had exceeded his authority, nor that the order “severely” burdened voters and their right to vote.
“The plaintiffs complain that limiting early hand-deliveries of mail-in ballots to one office per county requires more travel time for some voters. But this ignores the other options for casting their ballots that these voters have,” the opinion read. It noted that voters can also vote in person for an expanded period of time than usual, drop off their mail-in ballot in a 45-day window before Election Day rather than on November 3 only, and also mail in their ballots.
The court also argued the risk of mailing the ballot is “small,” and “voters who are worried about it can mail their ballots in plenty of time before Election Day to eliminate the chance of untimely delivery.”
Previously, a state judge wrote in a ruling that Abbott’s order “would likely needlessly and unreasonably increase risks of exposure to Covid-19 infections” and “substantially burden potential voters’ constitutionally protected rights to vote, as a consequence of increased travel and delays, among other things.” His ruling was upheld by a state court of appeals.
This is a breaking story and will be updated.